requestId:68499abd4534f7.77110134.
Confucianism is responsible for ethics and thinking management
Author: Tu Keguo (researcher at the Civilization Research Institute of Shandong Academy of Social Sciences)
Source: “Ji Lu Journal” 2018 Issue 3
Time: Confucius 2569 The 16th day of Wuwu, the lunar month of Wuxu
If it is said that responsibility is the wrist and the sentiment, then it is the content of the behavior and the object of giving; good deeds are the goal of responsibility, the goal of improvement, and a kind of value sentiment. Confucianism in the past describes the “over” discussion and the “over” discussion that is extremely rich and has a high demand. Although Confucianism does not directly apply the combination of “responsible”, it often links “responsible” and “responsible” to ask, think, and correct problems, which not only enriches Confucian discussions but also perfects Confucianism’s sense of responsibility. Combined with the Confucianism’s responsibility for ethics is composed of four major departments: people must have gone through, they must be responsible for, they must be corrected, and they must be responsible for the reform.
Keywords: Confucianism/Responsible/Ethics
Title notesCultivation market: National Social Sciences Fund Project “Research on Confucian Responsible Ethics Thoughts in the Comparative Field of Chinese and Western Ethics” (14BZX046).
No matter from any perspective, Confucianism’s responsibility for ethical thinking cannot be ignored. This is because anyone can make such mistakes at any time, including the elimination of morality and the daily skills of everyone’s self-growth and self-perfection; the second is because the responsibility is closely related to the governance of the way, Xunzi took responsibility for the thinking framework of the world-governing thinking of “virtue is the master of punishment”. Some emperors in China settled in governing the country and had also issued the “sincereness of self-reliance” “; the three are because since Confucius created the Confucian concepts such as “approval of young people” and “do not change the situation” and so on, Confucianism has been continuously enriched and perfected in the past, and has formed the outstanding and unique Confucian ethical thinking, and developed into the organic study of Confucian moral philosophy in the context of Confucianism It was organized into a department and established a Chinese vocabulary system that was different from the Eastern ethics. The fourth is that Confucianism has cultivated traditional Chinese virtues through ethics and thoughts, and has formed the energy resources that every official in charge of the bureau and popular people can use to cultivate one’s own self-cultivation.
Confucianism has a very rich mindset for over-responsibility. It begins with an in-depth reminder of the rich connotations of “responsibility” and “over”. Come on the original meaningIn other words, “生” is from bei and jing. It is a transformed word for “生”, which means “生” and “生” refer to money. This connection between “生” and “生” means “生” to “生” means “the growth of money”. Regarding this meaning, “responsibility” refers to debts and debts. In terms of meaning, “responsibility” means to release debts, lending, high interest loans and debt compensation. In ordinary terms, “responsibility” has two connotations in ancient and Chinese and Confucian ideological systems: one refers to nominal responsibility, mission, crime, duty, etc., and the other is the “responsibility” of the verb. It has the meaning of appreciating, seeking, asking, handling, dismissing, dismissing, regulating, regulating, regulating, punishing, asking, urging, supervising and criticizing. The meaning of “over” is also diverse. There are three types of people who are closely related to the purpose of this article: one is transcendence and deviation, such as over-the-counter, over-the-counter, over-the-counter, over-the-counter, over-the-counter, over-the-counter, etc.; the other is error and error, such as over-the-counter, over-the-counter, etc., which corresponds to the merit. Xu Shen’s “Shi Wen Jiezi” says: “When it’s a sin.” The “pass” in Confucian texts sometimes has the same meaning as “passing”, such as Zixia said: “A righteous person is respectful and unlucky, and respectful and respectful and respectful” [1] (“Speech·Yuanqing”); another way is to see strange things and be responsible, such as Confucius said: “Is it true that I am over?” [1] (“Speech·Ji”) It is also like not to see strange things (not to see strange things), to be too polite (responsible, to see strange things), to be too appropriate (responsible) and so on. Confucianism attaches great importance to the life wisdom shown by “over”. Confucius even believed that by using the knowledge of “over”, we can master the true meaning of Confucian ethics, “benevolence”: “People pass by each other in their own party. After viewing, they know benevolence!”[1](“Speech Liren”)
If it is said that responsibility is the wrist and the sentiment, then over is the content of behavior and the object of giving and giving; good deeds are the goal of responsibility, the goal of improvement, and a kind of value sentiment. Confucianism in the past describes the “over” discussion and the “over” discussion that is extremely rich and has a high demand. Although Confucianism does not directly apply the combination of “responsible”, it often links “responsible” and “responsible” to ask, think, and correct problems, which not only enriches Confucian discussions but also perfects Confucianism’s sense of responsibility. In order to fight for the evil of learning in the Ming Dynasty, the phenomenon of “Lao’s words of Tao, and Buddha’s words of Tao” formed by the “Issue of utilitarianism and Taoism” was unclear, and the “Issue of utilitarianism” formed by “Lao’s words of Tao, and Buddha’s words of Tao”, 年后六费后六费后” which vigorously advocated the practical energy of learning, wrote the book “Man’s Religion” which developed Confucian cultivation skills, which focused on describing and systematically constructed unique merits. Combined with the Confucianism’s responsibility for ethics is composed of four major departments: people must have gone through, they must be responsible for, they must be corrected, and they must be responsible for the reform. In order to deeply explore and absorb the precious resources of Confucianism, this article is highlighted in sequence.
1. People must have had it
<The condition of "responsible" is "has been". As the saying goes, "Who can be without a saint?" However, for a Confucianism that values saints, even a saint is not unforeseen. Confucianism always settles on the perspective of personality and shows no problems in a person's past and incompetence.
Kong Hou and Zizi said: “The way a person is over is like the sun and the moon eclipses. When he passes, everyone sees it; when he goes, everyone admires it.” [1] (“Speech·Zi Zhang”) This confession is that even a person is overly righteous, but the way a person is overly bright and wise, once he changes, people will admire him as well. On the contrary, gentlemen often seem to be like what Zixia said. 官网站dcard: “A gentleman must be a writer.”[1](“Speech·Zizhang”) When Mencius described the responsibility of “the heaven will surrender to this person”, he pointed out from the perspective of life’s philosophical philosophy that a person will make mistakes because of his frequent mistakes: “People always pass by, and then they can change; trapped in their hearts, and weighed in. href=”https://twsugarhug.org/”>Baobao.com pptbeing guilty and then doing; sympathizing with color, and then making sound, then metaphor. “[1](“Mencius·Gaozi II”) This philosophical distortion not only expresses the moral self-responsibility that people can change, but also deeply reminds people of the infinite human nature that must make mistakes. “Mencius: Gongsun Chou” has discussed the discussion on whether saints can “have been done” to promote dynamic discussions. King Qi expressed his deep guilt in Mencius. Chen Chen did not need to worry about his explanation, and said that even Duke Zhou had “made Guan Shu to supervise the Yin dynasty and Guan Shu was not absolutely “benevolent and wise”. Then he asked Mencius for explanation and asked, “Have you ever been a sage?” Mencius replied:
Duke Zhou is younger; Uncle Guan is younger. Isn’t it appropriate to pass by Duke Zhou? Moreover, the righteous people in anci
[/p>
[/p>
